Tuesday, January 03, 2012

The Future of Signal Mountain

In spite of my affinity for Calvin and Hobbes, I would like to resolve to blog more. This being an election year, I expect I will venture forth into national issues, however for now I'd like to discuss a place near and dear to my heart... Signal Mountain. As I have said before, I wasn't born here, but my daughter was... I wasn't raised here but my son was. I have lived in this community for over 18 years, longer than I've lived any place before. I have a great desire to see Signal Mountain continue to be a great place to live.

Growth continues to be a major issue for Signal Mountain. However, in spite of those who still worry about "unbridled" growth in the area, the facts (based on census data) are that the town is not growing at all and is probably shrinking. While some may find this a good thing, the recent tax increase passed by the Town Council shows the downside of our town's current policy. I have used my experience as a biologist and physician to guide my approach to town policy. I have in the past compared town growth to human growth. When our children are young, we all want to see them grow to be big and strong, but once mature, future growth can manifest as obesity or cancer. Thus a town has to be careful not to grow in an uncontrolled manner, metastasizing all over the countryside and dying from the center out. However, like in all science one cannot oversimplify. The reality is that even in maturity we are not stagnant. We must continually grow just to replace our body's dead cells and we should be continually focusing on nutrition and exercise so we grow healthy and build muscle, not fat. So, now that I've beat this analogy to death, we cannot allow our town to stagnate.  

When I joined the Town Council in 2006, we started on a growth plan that I thought we could complete in my four year term. First was to be a new Land Use Plan which we completed in my first year. We next planned to rewrite our town's zoning based on that Land Use Plan which was based on the progressive, environmentally responsible conservation development principles of Randall Arendt. We soon realized that we also need to rewrite our subdivision regulations as part of this process. We began this in early 2008 and have yet to finish. I have heard that the subdivision regulations are finished, after four years, but it is not clear if they have been formally adopted yet. They certainly aren't on the town's website and, if there have been major announcements of public hearings on these regs, I certainly haven't seen them and I do try to pay attention. At any rate, the truly "heavy lifting" of rewriting the zoning regulations has not even begun. I'm not optimistic about the outcome of this since the Planning Commission and Town Council's majority have long since rejected Mr. Arendt and his principles.

So, moving forward what is the vision for the town? This is a big year for our town. It is an election year and three positions (Lusk, Allen and Wallace) will be up for re-election. Also, at the end of the year we will grow through the process of annexation which was finalized a year ago. The neighborhoods of Fox Run and Windtree will both join our town. While this will bring some new income, it also brings expenses and the net effect is fairly minimal (about an extra $100,000 per year, if I recall, worth about 5 cents in property taxes). However, the true advantage of adding these neighborhoods is the addition of the intangible assets of these citizens, their talents and brain power. I find this most exciting of all.

This brings up an issue that I think needs discussion. I have heard discussed the idea of moving to having electoral districts in Signal Mountain. Red Bank and, I believe East Ridge (along with Chattanooga, of course) have district elections. As we expand not only in population, but more importantly in geography, it seems like a good time to start thinking about the idea of assuring representation of all areas of the town. I'd like to toss this out as a discussion point and hope to expand on it later. In all honesty, I don't know exactly what would be involved legally, but the first step is to decide if it is something to pursue. I would encourage my readers to consider commenting on this issue (or any issue) on this blog. If you prefer, you can email me (paulmhmd@comcast.net) and I will post your email as a comment if you give me permission.

Finally, I don't think it is premature to realize that our fair town will be 100 years old in 2019. That seems like a long time off, but it would be nice to consider starting some community based discussion on how we would like to celebrate our centennial.

So, our future can be bright, but we need to seize it and make positive decisions. We can determine what kind of future Signal Mountain will have. If you wonder if this is important, just go ask your kids!

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I like the idea of electoral districts on Signal. I think it would make individual council members more accountable and more available to constituents. Along with this dialogue, I'd like to propose expanding the council from 5 to 7 members. Perhaps you could have 5 assigned to districts and 2 at large members. The advantage of more members is that it diffuses the authority and makes it less likely that a small majority can steal the show as seems to be the case of late.

Keep on blogging, dude!

Anonymous said...

I like the idea of electoral districts on Signal. I think
it would make individual council members more accountable and more
available to constituents. Along with this dialogue, I'd like to propose expanding the council from 5 to 7 members. Perhaps you could have 5 assigned to districts and 2 at large members. The advantage of more members is that it diffuses the authority and makes it less likely that a small majority can steal the show as seems to be the case of late.

Anonymous said...

I don't like the idea of mixing at-large and district-based representation in the same body. I think it creates "separate and unequal" types of representation. It should be all one or the other. Personally I don't think Signal Mountain is anywhere near big enough or diverse enough for district-based representation to make much of a difference. If anything, it could have a negative effect since sitting council members would be tempted to gerrymander their districts to avoid strong challengers, or pit disliked colleagues against each other. I mean, sure, that NEVER happens at the county, state, or federal level :) but it could happen here....

Paul M. Hendricks said...

I must say this is exactly what I had hoped would happen, that this blog could be a forum for discussing issues affecting our community. As long as we are civil, we should be able to agree or disagree and still work together. I floated this proposal which was brought to me by a friend and now we have a comment for and one against. I hope more people would comment. Obviously, I would love for people to attach their names to their comments, but I'm willing to post anonymous comments as long as their are civil and constructive. I will not be a forum for "rants" or personal attacks.
Paul M. Hendricks